Search...

Compatibility [05] Front derailleurs

This post explains bicycle front derailleur compatibility of various makes and models. For a detailed explanation of front derailleur (FD in the rest of this post) mounting systems, cable routing and capacity, read this article: Front derailleur.

Before you start, to avoid any misunderstanding:
please take the 5 minutes needed to read the compatibility articles use instructions.

FDs differ in several categories (they are all explained with pictures in the above linked Front derailleur article):

TL/DR

  1. Mounting: braze on, clamp mounted, or direct mounted
  2. Cable routing: top pull, bottom pull, or bidirectional pull (double pull)
  3. Big front chainring teeth number that FD is designed for and mounting angle
  4. Number of front chainrings: double vs triple
  5. FD cage rotation relative to the clamp position: high clamp, low clamp, or the new Shimano side-swing
  6. MTB vs Road FD
  7. Number of speeds (number of rear sprockets and chain width) FD is designed for
  8. Exceptions


TL/DR

Briefly put:
With front derailleurs, it is important to have their cage match the curve of your largest chainring, and to have their movement match the amount of cable your shifter pulls/releases.

Yes, it is always safe to buy a matching set of FD, cranks and shifters, but that’s not always practical (depending on what you already have or can source) or it may not always give you the gearing range that you need.

That’s why this article lists and explains the things that you should pay attention to when mix-matching.

– T.O.C. –


1. Mounting

FDs are made for mounting on frame fixed braze on, or come with clamps for mounting on the seat tube. If FD comes with a clamp, seat tube diameter must match the clamp diameter. A newer standard, used on mountain bikes is the direct mount, it is explained at the end of this chapter.

If a frame comes with a brazed on FD mount, in order to mount a clamp on FD, the frame mount must be removed (cut off). In some (rare) cases the clamp can be put above/below the frame mount, so it can stay, as long as it doesn’t interfere with FD movement and proper mounting relative to the front chainrings.

Standard clamp (and seat tube) sizes are:
1 1/8″ (28.6 mm)
1 1/4″ (31.8 mm) and
1 3/8″ (34.9 mm)

If a FD is a braze on type and the frame doesn’t have a FD hanger (or the frame hanger is too low/high for the size of front chainrings used), a separate clamp can be bought so that FD can be fixed to it. This is a much more universal type of FD.

Direct mount FDs can often be fitted to a frame without direct mount attachment holes using an adapter, enabling the FD to be secured by a (threaded) BB shell. There are also adapters for frames with a round seat tube cross section of a standard width, so that a direct mount FD can be attached to them.

Frames with exotic seat tubes (either by cross section that isn’t round, or by diameter that varies from the three standar sizes), often have FD mounts made on the frame. If, for any reason, those mounts can’t be used (damaged, or not fitting the FD at hand), an adapter can be used – held in place by the BB shell – for frames with a threaded BB at least.

– T.O.C. –


2. Cable routing

There are FDs that have a cable attached from below, from above, or from any of the two. Frames usually have only one type of cable routing.

With double routed FDs this isn’t important, but for the other models, if the FD’s cable routing doesn’t match the frame design, there is a special adapter that can reverse the cable direction.

In the picture above, the frame has cable routing so that FD cable comes from above. FD is designed for bottom cable routing. The adapter with a wheel onto which the cable is placed is mounted on the seat tube below the FD, so that the cable can go over it and up to the FD. Everyone is happy. 🙂

Almost all the road FDs have bottom pull cable routing, while most MTB FDs have either top, or dual cable pull. 

– T.O.C. –


3. Teeth number (the size) of the largest front chainring a)
and mounting angle b)

a) teeth number

FD is curved in order to align with the curve of the largest front chainring. A typical MTB chainring has 42 teeth, while road bike chainrings often come with 53 teeth. A smaller chainring requires the FD to have a much more curve in order to align (and vice versa).

Imagine in the picture above that the FD cage is shaped to match the middle chainring. It would have to be mounted either too high, or it’s rear part would bump into the big chainring, since it has too sharp a curve.

FDs are usually made to match chainrings with 42, 48, 50, or 53 teeth. If FD and large chainring are mismatched for a couple of teeth, there’s no problems, it’s close enough. If, however, a difference is large, the following problems occur:

  • Chainring has a lot more teeth than the FD is designed for: like explained above. FD will have to be mounted too high, which will make shifting slow, poor and might cause chain rub on the rear lowest part of the FD after shifting onto the smallest chainring.
  • Chainring has a lot less teeth than the FD is designed for: front part of FD will be correctly positioned, while the rear part of the cage will remain high up, and the chainring curves sharply down. It will not align. This will not hurt shifting, but will cause a lot of chain rub on the FD cage – as soon as some shifting gears in the rear sprockets causes minimal amount of cross chaining.


b) mounting angle

Seat tube angle (onto which FD is mounted) is usually about 70 to 73 degrees for road bikes, while MTBs usually have a bit steeper seat tubes (closer to vertical vertical compared to road bike ones), of around 75 or more degrees. If a FD designed for a more vertical tube is mounted on a tube that has a less vertical angle, the effect will be similar to that of combining a FD designed for a lot smaller chainring, with a chainring that is bigger. And vice versa.

Though this is a bit misleading. For a full disclosure: modern road and MTB frames don’t really differ all that much by seat tube angles. What differs is the angle between the chainstay and the seat tube. MTB bikes have that angle a lot smaller, compared to road bikes (by roughly 5, or more degrees), and that is the angle that matters as far as front derailleurs are concerned (see the next paragraph, below the picture).

It is worth noting (thanks to Drew for pointing it out) that frame manufacturers provide seat tube angle as measured from horizontal (which matters for riding position fitting), while Shimano (for one) notes their front derailleur angle as the one between the seat tube and the chainstay (which actually is what matters for the front derailleurs). So those (“Shimano”) angles are often 61 to 66° degrees for road FDs, and 66 to 69° for MTB front derailleurs.

Similar problems can occur if the mounting position isn’t correct – happens on some special, or custom built frames.

If a FD is a braze on mounted type, this can be corrected with made adapters:

– T.O.C. –


4. Double vs triple

FDs are made in two variants: for double and for triple front chainrings.

Double FD will work with a triple chainring if the difference in teeth number between the smallest and the largest chainring is rather small (which defeats the purpose of a triple chainring though). For example a 34-42-48 chainring. Also, if the operation (movement) of the FD is limited to the two largest chainrings, it can work OK.

Triple FD will work on a double chainring if the difference in teeth number between the chainrings isn’t bigger than 12. One can “get away” with 14 as well, but the lower difference, the better.

Compact cranksets, with two chainrings that vastly differ in size (usually 34-50 combination) will work well only with double FDs with the curve appropriate for the big ring size (50 to 52). Even when using a double FD, it is best to keep the tooth cound difference up to 16 (like with 34-50, or 36-52 chainring combinations).

– T.O.C. –


5. High clamp, low clamp, or side-swing

With older standard for FDs, the cage is below the mount, so that FD cage swings below the FD body. These are the high clamp FDs. Low clamp is a newer Shimano system meant for MTBs with rear suspension. FD cage is practically in line with the mount. This leaves more room for mounting the rear suspension to the seat tube. Previously used terms for this were bottom swing (for high clamp) and top swing (for low clamp), but with the introduction of Shimano side-swing system (explained at the end of this chapter), these terms are no longer precise enough.

If the bike has no rear suspension, or there is enough room for a standard FD below the suspension, it is irrelevant which type of FD is mounted (as long as it’s suitable in terms of other explained criteria – angle, size etc.).

The newest Shimano system is the side-swing, where the cage rotates sideways. These FDs can be clamped with a high clamp, low clamp, or using a direct mount system.

– T.O.C. –


6. MTB vs road FD

Shimano road and MTB FDs have different cable pull ratios – that is the amount of FD movement for each mm of cable movement. This means that MTB FDs might not work well with indexed road shifters and vice versa.

With double chainrings, this issue can be fixed by adjusting limit screws and it could be made to work (if not perfectly). With triple chainrings, it is harder to get it to work properly. However, the FD cage is a lot wider than the chain and triple FDs have just 3 positions you need to “match” (unlike reaer derailleurs with 6 to 13 different positions), so depending on the particular shifter – FD combination, even that can sometimes be made to work OK.

Note that MTB shifters usually have 2 clicks (for a total of 3 FD positions), while road bike STI shifters have 2 “full clicks” and 3 “trim” clicks (for minor FD position adjustments), so a total of 5 clicks/positions. Friction shifters, of course, give you an unlimited freedom in terms of fine-tuning the FD’s position. 🙂

Having said all this and in spite of officially different cable pull, some FDs work OK with all the shifters, regardless of whether it is road, or MTB. Exception are the Shimano 11 speed road FDs and Shimano Tiagra 4700 10 speed FDs – they have a (vastly) different cable pull (and cable anchor arm), so they are not compatible. So, while this will not shift perfectly, especially with triples, it is worth giving a try and seeing if it’s good enough for one’s criteria – if what one has on hand are mismatched road and mtb shifters and FDs. If it doesn’t work satisfactory, the cheaper option is to find a FD that matches the shifter.

– T.O.C. –


7. Number of speeds

The last AND the least important.  🙂

FDs are made for a certain number of speeds, i.e. number of rear sprockets. The more speeds, the narrower the chain. There are FDs for 6 to 8 speeds, then for 9, 10 and 11 speeds. Cage width is made to match the planned chain width.

However, since the chain moves left-right on the rear sprockets, FD cage is a lot wider than the chain. That is why it is possible to mount a 10 speed FD and use it with a 6 to 8 speed chain.

FDs are very forgiving in terms of speed number (even in terms of manufacturers), so they can be mixed and matched. One of the few pieces of equipment where it is possible to change a Campagnolo 10 speed with a Shimano 8 speed and it all works.

When a FD for more speeds is put on a chain for fewer speeds, the only bad effect is more chain rub. Since the FD cage is narrower, smaller angling of the chain (when changing gears at the back) will cause it to rub the FD cage. With indexed shifters, a trimming option can help, while with friction shifters this is not an issue.

– T.O.C. –


8. Exceptions

Exception to this rule are Shimano 11 speed road FDs. They will not work very well with anything but Shimano 11 speed road shifters and Shimano Tiagra 4700 10 speed road shifters. Same goes for Tiagra 4700 FDs. Newest Campagnolo 11 speed system: Revolution 11+ (older one is Revolution 11) also requires matching (Revolution 11+) shifters and derailleurs. The reason for incompatibility lies in different cable attachment and amount of needed cable pull per gear change. Why was something that had already worked “fixed” has probably more to do with the marketing, than with the engineering department of the company.

Another exception is the new “gravel” group (with hydraulic brakes): Shimano GRX. Caple pull wise it’s the same as Tiagra 4700.

– T.O.C. –


Last updated:


Originally published:



Related post – Front derailleur:

Bicycle front derailleur (FD). Types of front derailleurs, frame mount standards, FD compatibility...
Bicycle front derailleur (FD). Types of front derailleurs, frame mount standards, FD compatibility…


Compatibility posts are also available in eBook (printable and Kindle) and paperback editions on Amazon:

Bicycle drivetrain compatibility book
Bicycle drivetrain compatibility book

The existing comments (questions and answers) posted under this article were moved to this BikeGremlin forum thread:
https://www.bikegremlin.net/threads/compatibility-05-front-derailleurs-article-comments.101/

– T.O.C. –

148 thoughts on “Compatibility [05] Front derailleurs”

  1. Hello, thats a great article.

    I have a bike with Sora R300 9s FD and crankset (50/34), and i would like to use Alivio M4000 FC MT210 46/30 crankset (also 9s) do you think it could be possible?

    Thanks for the help

    • Hi Matheus,

      The new cranks have fewer teeth. That could cause less than perfect shifting, as the FD’s cage won’t perfectly match the chainring’s curve.

      Though I would expect it to work, if with a bit slower shifting.

      Relja

  2. Great article, great site. Everything is very easy to understand. I do have one question though. I have a 2011 Santa Cruz Superlight that I have rebuilt from the ground up. I will be using a Shimano FC-MT210 ACERA 22/30/40Т 170мм Hollowtech II BB-MT500 crankset, and am trying to find an Acera FD that will work. The rear is a Shimano Acera Shimano Acera RD-M360. The bike is older, so it will need to be clamp mount, top pull. But here is my problem. The seatpost angle is 72.5 degrees – That’s from the factory sheet. Most FDs I see say they will work with 66-69 degrees angle. Can you please help me understand what I need? I am trying to stay with the Acera groupset. All your help is greatly appreciated.

  3. Thanks so much for this resource. Sorry if I missed it, but how important is ‘FD capacity’? I just picked up a sora fd-3030 to replace an older suntour xct (planning to run with 8 sp chain/RD/cassette)—I checked that the max ring would work with my crank set and that I would have enough chain wrap with my cassette, but I now realize I have a 22 cog difference in my cranks (28-40-50), and the 3030 says it has a max capacity of 20. Should I return it or could I make it work? I don’t spend much time in the small ring fwiw

    • Since Shimano is often “conservative” when listing the limits, I would give it a try with the 28-40-50 chainrings before giving up, expecting it to work OK.

      Of course, to be 100% sure before trying, I would stick to the specs and either mount a 48T largest chainring, or mount a 30T smallest chainring.

      Relja

  4. Hello,

    I have a triple deore 26-36-48 octalink crankset and planning to swap it for a custom 44-28 external BB setup.
    I’m thinking about a M785 crank (customized, it is one of the few crank with a round 104/64bcd I found) with a M786 FD.
    The FD is listed for 44 max and 14 tooth difference.

    If I understand correctly it “should” work ? And keeping my current FD doesn’t ?
    Or knowing that I have a 73.5d seat tube perhaps I should use a GRX FD (46-30 and for a narrower chain line) ?
    Using friction so no further problems

    Thank you in advance !
    (I’m not putting a grx crank in since it doesn’t come in 44-28 and has a much smaller chainline compared to my triple)

    • Hi Remi,

      GRX cranks set chainrings further out (so, they have a wider chainline). They should work, but it isn’t perfect if you plan to use the large chainring a lot.

      Triple FDs don’t play nicely with compact double cranks (the 16T difference between adjacent chainrings is too much for them).

      So, ideally, you want a double FD with a cage to match your 44T large chainring, and your seat tube angle.

      If that is OK, I would not worry about a 14T capacity (at 16T your setup should work, especially with friction shifters).

      Alternativelly, you could try a matching GRX shifter, but I’m not sure if it can move close enough towards the frame to shift to the small chainring on non-GRX cranks (it might, but it might not).

      Relja

    • Thank you for your answer Relja.

      So it’s going to be a grx FD (built for frames @73° ish degrees) with a mtb double cranks:
      grx cranks have a 47mm chain line (and it’s a pain in the b. to find asymetrical 44 and 28 cranks for them) whearas the mtb doubles hover from 48 to 50 like my triple that sits at 50mm.
      Plus bigger Q factor !

      Have a nice day

Comments are closed.


Please use the BikeGremlin.net forum for any comments or questions.

If you've found any errors or lacking information in the article(s) - please let me know by commenting on the BikeGremlin forum.
You can comment anonymously (by registering with any name/nickname), but I think it is good to publicly document all the article additions (and especially corrections) - even if their author chooses to remain anonymous.

Tools and other products that I use (and can recommend)

TOC
Skip to content