Home » Technical part » Standards » Seatpost diameter sizes (standards)

Seatpost diameter sizes (standards)

Updated: 15/04/2021.

To help prevent mistakes when purchasing or changing seatposts, this article explains what kinds of seatpost diameters are most commonly used and how they are measured. Only diameter (width) is dealt with here. The length of the seatpost depends on frame geometry (design) and size – i.e. how much the saddle needs to be raised from the end of the seat tube. A separate article explains the maximum amount of seatpost extension from the frame (minimal insertion length). For seatpost height in terms of bicycle fitting, see: Setting up comfortable riding position.

0. Terms

It is important to understand two terms:

  • seat tube” – the tube in the frame that holds the seatpost.
  • seatpost” – the post the saddle is mounted on.

Picture 1 shows a seatpost (1), and a seat tube (2):

1. A bit of history

The first bicycle frames were made mostly from steel, with steel tubes of a standard (outer) diameter. The British and Italian standard diameter for seat tubes was 1 1/8″ (28.6 mm). Older French bicycles used 28 mm tubing. Old US bicycles (mostly BMX and older bikes that used one-piece cranks) was 1″ (25.4 mm).

Standard outer diameter dimensions were important so that derailleur clamps etc. could be made in exact matching sizes (derailleur clamp inner diameter needs to match the seat tube’s outer diameter). Higher quality frames are usually made with thinned down tube walls to reduce the weight of the frame. This meant that a wider seatpost diameter usually meant a higher quality (and lighter) frame. So high-quality frames with 1 1/8″ seat tubes usually had 27.2 mm wide seatposts.

A more modern trend, mostly on mountain bikes, where stronger seatposts are required (without too much extra weight) led to a new “oversized” standard of 27.4 mm (and wider).

2. Measuring required seatpost diameter

One (precise) measurement is often better than a thousand expert opinions” – author’s expert opinion.  ๐Ÿ™‚

How to measure the seatpost diameter? The easiest and most accurate method is to use calipers (Vernier, or digital), as shown in picture 2.

Measuring seatpost diameter using Vernier calipers. Source: forums.mtbr.com Picture 2
Measuring seatpost diameter using calipers.
Source: forums.mtbr.com
Picture 2

It can be seen from picture 2 that the seatpost is marked as 31.6 mm wide (and 410 mm long), while it really measures only 31.42 mm. This means the seatpost will probably not fit firmly enough to stay in place inside a seat tube meant for 31.6 mm wide seatposts. Always measure! ๐Ÿ™‚

Measuring a seat tube diameter is often necessary before purchasing, or changing the seatpost. How should one do that? Three methods will be explained here, but one can always be creative. ๐Ÿ™‚

Method 1: if the frame already has a mounted matching seatpost – one that attaches firmly enough so it doesn’t slide, while being narrow enough to allow easy mounting and dismounting – then it is sufficient to measure its outer diameter, as was explained above in the section – “How to measure the seatpost diameter?”.

Method 2: using calipers, as shown in picture 3.

Measuring inner diameter of the seat tube. Source: forums.mtbr.com Picture 3
Measuring the inner diameter of the seat tube.
Source: forums.mtbr.com
Picture 3

Method 3: using special seat post sizing rods. These are rods with an increasing diameter from one end to the other, with a scale noting the diameter in standard sizes. The rod is simply placed in the seat tube and the matching diameter is the one just above the end of the seat tube (the first visible number on the rod still sticking out of the tube). Place a screwdriver through a hole at the top of the rod, just to make sure it doesn’t drop all the way in if the sizing rod is too small.ย  ๐Ÿ™‚

Seat tube sizing rods. Source: bikeforums.net Picture 4
Seat tube sizing rods.
Source: bikeforums.net
Picture 4

Since measuring often can’t be done to a 1/100 of a millimeter in accuracy, the next section gives a list of the most commonly used standard seatpost diameters. If a measured diameter differs, it can be assumed that the correct diameter is the standard one that most closely matches the measured diameter.

3. Standard seatpost diameters

Table 1 gives a list (in mm) of standard diameter sizes:

Standard seatpost diameters Table 1
Standard seatpost diameters
Table 1

Seatpost diameters are usually a multiple of 0.2 mm (but not always, as tables 1 and 2 show). If a measured value differs and most closely matches a value that is not a multiple of 0.2, there is a high probability that the closest multiple of 0.2 mm size will fit. For example, a measured 25.5 will most probably fit a 25.4 mm wide (nominal and measured width) seatpost. A rule of thumb is that the widest post that slides in without being forced (other than pushing or twisting by hand) is the right one. If it drops in, with play, before the pinch bolt is tightened, the seatpost is probably too narrow.

A few notes, just in case:

  • If a seatpost wobbles or rocks left-right (before tightening the clamp), it is probably too narrow.
  • Don’t punch it in. If it can’t be eased in by hand, it’s probably too wide. Forcing it in makes it very, very difficult to move or take out later. It might even damage some frames.

For easier managing, table 2 gives an overview of seatpost diameters most commonly used on modern bicycles (from the end of the 20th century to now).

Seatpost diameters most commonly used on "modern" bicycles. Table 2
Seatpost diameters most commonly used on “modern” bicycles.
Table 2

Related post – How to choose a comfortable saddle (the first in a series of 5 posts explains saddle materials):

Bicycle saddle materials
Bicycle saddle materials
Share this article...

25 thoughts on “Seatpost diameter sizes (standards)”

  1. I want to use a 31.8 or 30,9 dropper post on my 34.9 seatpost. what shims would work for this?

    • I’d look for an adapter that notes those very dimensions: 34.9 to 31.8, or 34.9 to 30.9 (depending on the choice).

  2. What size diameter seatpost do I need for my 1960’s 3 speed Tote Cycle and where can I get original old stock chrome one. Thank you.

  3. Another way to measure the circumference, albeit not super exact, is to use a measure tape and tie it around the seatpost.

    • If memory serves me well, dividing that with the number Pi should give the diameter.
      Haven’t tried the method, but I suspect it to be too imprecise for this use.

    • I’m upgrading my bike and my post I’m cangi g from a 26.8 to a 31.6. I’m buying a vernier because I cannot get a accurate measurements for a setpost adapter. The spacer I’m hoping that will work is a 26.8-31.8. My question is will I have to purchase to seat post clamps for this to work and be safe?

    • Not sure I understand the setup, but, if a narrower seatpost is to be inserted, using an adapter to fit the difference between the seat tube, and the seat post – then no need to change the clamp, if it’s in good condition.

      However, if seatpost is to be extended by more than some 20 centimetres, I would look for a well matching seatpost, not use an adapter – because adapters are usually not very deep (long), so won’t offer much of a support for the seatpost. Hope I’ve explained well what I mean.

    • Measuring the circumference of the post and dividing by Pi is a good method. There are even circumference tape measures to do it.
      If you donโ€™t have calipers, youโ€™re hard-pressed to get the diameter. An adjustable wrench can be used as calipers, then measure the gap on the wrench. However, itโ€™s almost impossible to distinguish 0.2 mm increments with a tape measure.
      But measuring the circumference means you only have to distinguish a 0.6 mm difference (because everything is multiplied by 3.14…), which is doable.

      Measuring the size of the hole in the seat postโ€”well, that requires ID calipers, gauges, or sticking something into it then marking it so you can measure it like the seat post. That will introduce more error. For example, take some poster board (stiff paper), roll it up, insert it, and let it expand to fill the hole. Making sure itโ€™s fully expanded & secure, mark the edge of the paper with a marker. Pull out the paper, unroll it, and measure between the edge and the mark (and divide by Pi).
      Iโ€™ve done it before, and it does work well enough.

  4. Your article is confusing, because of some obvious errors. First, “Picture 1” is not labeled, and nowhere do your explain which blue arrow is pointing at which part.

    Also, at several parts you refer to Vernier calipers, but none of your images have Vernier calipers. You show just plain old digital calipers that don’t have a Vernier scale. Look up what a Vernier caliper actually is.

    Finally, the suggestion that a less than 0.2mm difference in seat post diameter would make the post too small to fit snugly in the seat tube is laughable. Any halfway decent clamp should easily account for 1mm error or more.

    • Although it seems a bit snarky, your comment has been very useful.
      One of the WordPress updates seems to have removed labels on picture galleries (where more than one picture is placed side by side). Hadn’t noticed it. It’s fixed now, to the best way I could fix it with this “version” (doesn’t allow labeling each picture separately, without the label being put over a picture, instead of beneath it).

      “Vernier calipers” – English is not my native. The name of those calipers, whether analogue (with a Vernier scale), or digital, is the same in my native (“ล ubler” – an “imported” German term). I will correct the term once I double check the proper English technical terminology.

      As for the 0.2 mm difference, it is probably counter intuitive for many people, but in practice it can cause one, or several of the following:
      – Seatpost slipping under rider weight and road bumps (either down, or turning sideways – or both).
      – Seat tube cracking near the seatpost clamp area (steel frames are the least susceptible to this, while carbon fiber ones are the most “sensitive” to such problems).

      I would normally say: “don’t take my word for it, try it, with a smaller diameter seatpost (0.2 mm is enough, but you can go 0.5, or 1 mm, as you said, to get “faster” results)”. However, this does pose a risk of damaging a frame, so do it only on a frame you are willing/prepared to damage.

      Thank you for what is in effect a very helpful, constructive feedback.
      If you find any other mistakes, feel free to note them. I try to keep this as correct, and up-to-date as possible.

  5. Most of your information is geared towards the later 20th Century bicycles. Iโ€™m trying to find information about the size of a 1948 Columbia Custom Deluxe Ladies bicycle seat post. I measured it with a digital caliper and it reads 15.75 mm. I checked Sheldon Browns site and his list did not show Columbiaโ€™s. This bicycle was my mothers and Iโ€™m trying to put it back together for her 85th birthday in April or at least by Mothers Day.
    So far I have not found any seat posts that are that small (no clue what became of the original) Any advise would be greatly appreciated.

    • Reading this with a smile on my face – a lovely idea for a birthday surprise. ๐Ÿ™‚

      15.75 mm is very narrow – I’ve never seen any seatpost with an under 20 mm outer diameter.

      Of course, where there’s a will, there’s a way. I have a few ideas:

      Does the frame have some shims that reduce the seat-tube’s inner diameter, allowing such a narrow seatpost to be held in place?
      If yes – maybe those could be taken out to fit a “more standard” diameter seatpost?

      Most seatposts are a lot wider than 15.75 mm. Machining the sidewalls down would weaken them tremendously in my opinion.
      But, a narrower pipe could probably be sourced, or even a steel rod – then it’s up to finding a turner to process it into the appropriate diameter size.
      Painting, or chrome plating could also be done – just take it into account when machining to not have the new seatpost too narrow, or too wide.
      Having said that: going a bit too narrow can be fixed with some DIY shims from Coca-Cola cans (that’s one thing that drink is good for ๐Ÿ™‚ ),
      while going a bit too wide would call for some more grinding – but it’s probably a safer way to go (“measure three times, cut once” is a local saying).

      If making a custom seatpost, it’s probably a good idea to keep the upper part with about 23 mm outer diameter, to fit most saddle adapters (Amazon affiliate link – though I prefer buying locally and supporting the local small shops).

      My schedule is hectic and I can’t offer to make that myself and mail it, while this is a rather time-sensitive operation (I also don’t have a very good experience with our mail system’s “swiftness” and reliability) – but if you have any other questions, let me know. More than happy to help however I can. Good luck! ๐Ÿ™‚


  6. hi i have a bought a used carbon bike the seatpost 31.6mm is stuck solid could i cut it and insert an 30.2mm or 27.5mm seatpost inside?

    • Fred here again. I would install a (expendable) saddle on the seatpost and “screw” the seatpost out by turning the saddle, if it’s too stuck i would hang up the bike by the saddle so the saddle sits in fixed position and then “screw” the bike frame so that gravity helps the seatpost go out.

  7. HI,

    I read your article and it prove most useful.
    I measured my seatpost diameter and it turn out to be 40mm.
    I know it is large by modern standard do you have any idea where i can find such a seatpost clamp.

  8. I would love to know why every 25.4mm seatpost i have been trying to get for my vintage bike (need something ~300mm long) is not actually 25.4mm. Two “25.4” posts so far have been measured at .988 inches. Infuriating :). The one that was on the bike is exactly 1″/25.4mm so everything else will not clamp/fall in.

    • Hi Erik,

      “Give me the metric system, or give me death!” ๐Ÿ™‚

      Joking a bit. ๐Ÿ™‚
      Anyway, when I turn .988″ into mm, it is below 20.1 mm (20.0952 to be exact).

      As far as seatpost tolerances go, that’s significantly more than 25.0 mm (enough to not fit into a 25.0 mm seat tube), and a lot less than 25.4 – practically “two sizes” smaller, enough to make the tube crack even if the clamp manages to keep such a seatpost in place.

      Can’t understand that much of a mismatch. I value quality and precision over quantity, but it seems that many manufacturers have a different view on that. No other explanation comes to mind.

      Ritchey company used to be quite good, but I haven’t bought anything from them for a while – and they don’t seem to be making any 25.4 mm sized ones.
      The standard seems to be considered obsolete. ๐Ÿ™

      Locally (in Novi Sad), I can source 25.4 mm seatposts, but of poor quality – the clamp has very coarse saddle angle adjustment, so depending on the seat tube angle, the saddle can end up being either too much upwards, or downwards tilted (if you know what I mean).

      2nd hand market (and local bike shops) is where I’d look. With a wallet in one hand, and accurate & precise callipers in the other. ๐Ÿ™‚


    • Hi Bob,

      I would rather not risk making the seatpost walls thinner (and thus weaker).

      But it is possible.


Leave a comment

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.