Previous posts in this series have explained: 1. saddle materials, 2. padding thickness (and softness), 3. saddle shapes and 4. measuring one’s sit bone width. This post explains how to choose an optimal saddle width. Apologies in advance if some parts resemble an anathomy notebook. 🙂   The last chapter (5.) gives a simple formula and the reader can jump straight to it. Previous chapters are given to provide an explanation why it is so. Because choosing a saddle is very individual and can hardly be put in a formula, the given explanation can help in search of a good fitting saddle (as well as the previous four posts on this topic).

If you have any questions (or additions and corrections), please use the BikeGremlin forum:
www.bikegremlin.net

TL/DR

## TL/DR

Measure your sit bone width, and add from zero to four cm to that (chapter 5), depending on how upright you are sitting on the bicycle (zero is for super-TT-aero, and +4 is for fully upright sitting).

This article explains the reasons why that works, with a few nuances, and finishes with some saddle models that I like (but saddle choice is very subjective, which is why I bothered with this whole saddle article series, instead of just giving you a shopping recommendation).

– T.O.C. –

## 1. Why is it important to choose an optimal saddle width?

After choosing a saddle material, padding and shape, it is important to choose an optimal saddle width. A saddle that is too wide can cause thigh chafing and irritation, while a too narrow one can cause discomfort in the pubic area.

– T.O.C. –

## 2. Prerequisites needed for determining the optimal saddle width

When choosing an optimal saddle width, two factors are important:

• Sitting position (how straight/leaned forward is one riding)
• Sit bone width

Sitting position can be straight (back at a 90 degree angle), slightly leaned (60 degree angle), more leaned/”aggressive” (about 45 degrees), or (almost) completely flat forward – see picture 1.

Measuring sit bone width is explained in the post: Measuring sit bone width. Sit bone width is an obvious factor when choosing a saddle width, but why is the sitting position important? That is explained in the next chapter:

– T.O.C. –

## 3. Sit bone curvature

Sit bones have a curved shape, narrowing from the rear towards the front. Shown in picture 2.

Saddle should provide support of the sit bones, so that body weight is not distributed over some other, more sensitive body parts. As the body is leaned forward, sit bones usually rotate forward as well (more, or less, depending on rider’s flexibility).

As the pelvis is rotated forward (picture 3), a narrower part of the pelvis is leaned on the saddle (picture 2). That is why the optimal saddle width depends on the riding position (picture 1).

Picture 4 shows this on a pelvis model:

Saddle that is too narrow for an upright sitting position can be of optimal width for a leaned forward riding position, and vice-versa (picture 5).

– T.O.C. –

Manufacturers usually note saddle width in milimeters on the part of the saddle where it is the widest. However, depending on saddle shape, not all of this width can be used to support the body (sit bones). The more a saddle is curved, the more it is important to make note of this.

Excess width is often important – but for reasons other than supporting the body. It has it’s merits in centering the rider on the saddle, eliminating sharp (chafing) edges, leaving the padding some room to flex etc. For this reason, width of the saddle (or the part of the saddle the sit bones are leaned on) should be at least two cm (one cm to each side) greater than the width of the part of the sit bones that are leaned on it.

Sounds complicated, it is simplified in the following, last, chapter.

– T.O.C. –

## 5. Which saddle width, get to the point?!

Picture 8 speaks more than a thousand words:

Picture 8 shows a simple guide: how many cm to add to the measured sit bone width in order to get an optimal saddle width.

For example, if a road bike is used, with very leaned forward position (like in the 2nd drawing from the left in picture 8), and if measured sit bone width is 125 mm, then a saddle should be 1 cm (10 mm) wider, which is about 135 mm.

It should be noted that this too is just a guide, a starting point when trying out new saddles. Optimal saddle width is also individual. Some riders prefer “one size” wider saddles, while others prefer slightly narrower.

When trying out a new saddle, give it a week or two time for the body to adapt, then decide whether it is comfortable or not. Once one, finally, finds a very good fitting saddle, it is best to buy 3-4 saddles at once, since shapes and models are changed almost every year. That way the search for a perfect saddle can be avoided for a long time.

Help BikeGremlin
stay online & independent

This website is educational, free, objective, and not commercial
(sponsors don’t enjoy paying if you mention all the product downsides that you notice 🙂 ).

How much does a WordPress website cost?

If you find this site to be good and helpful,
and if \$5 per month is what you can afford to set aside,
please consider supporting my work with a Patreon donation:

– T.O.C. –

## 6. Bicycle saddle models recommendations

Before buying, I suggest reading the other 4 short articles in this 5 article series (this one being the last, 5th):

For a concrete model recommendation, if it is of any help (though saddle choice is very subjective), these have served me very well over the years (using Amazon affiliate links):

An excellent MTB saddle is Selle Royal model Suez.

A rather athletic saddle, but its padding is not too hard, so they are comfortable even without the use of padded cycling shorts (bibs) – Amazon affiliate link. It is cut out in the middle, to eliminate any pressure on the “sensitive parts” of both men and women (for the latter claim I’m relying on the feedback I got from female cyclists who have used this model – just look at my pronouns 🙂 ).

An excellent saddle for city bicycles (and all the others with a more upright sitting position), is Brooks model Flyer.

Brooks Flyer is a bit heavier (steel frame, with leather). But thanks to its shape, and the springs at the rear, it is very comfortable, even on extremely long rides (cyclo-touring etc.). Springs are very hard, so you won’t be bouncing when pedalling, but they will absorb any harsh road shocks (bumps, potholes). The leather is great for the summer, but can feel a bit colder in the winter (compared to synthetic materials), and it can get soaked if left in the rain. So I’d avoid this for very wet, or cold climates.

Finally, a road bicycle recommendation – Fizik Antares R3 Open K:IUM Regular black

If you have any questions (or additions and corrections), please use the BikeGremlin forum:
www.bikegremlin.net

– T.O.C. –

### 1 thought on “Optimal saddle width – Bicycle saddle fit [05]”

If you've found any errors or lacking information in the article(s) - please let me know by commenting on the BikeGremlin forum.
You can comment anonymously (by registering with any name/nickname), but I think it is good to publicly document all the article additions (and especially corrections) - even if their author chooses to remain anonymous.

Tools and other products that I use (and can recommend)